FIFA has set the global football community buzzing after awarding the first-ever FIFA Peace Prize to American President Donald J. Trump. The honour, presented personally by FIFA President Gianni Infantino during the 2026 FIFA World Cup draw in Washington, D.C., has sparked both praise and widespread controversy as the international sporting body steps into unfamiliar political territory.
The ceremony took place at the prestigious John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, where global football leaders, ambassadors, team representatives, celebrities, and senior U.S. government officials gathered for the much-anticipated draw. Before the balls were rolled and groupings were announced, Infantino took the stage with a surprise announcement that immediately shifted global attention.
In a speech that was met with applause from some and raised eyebrows from others, Gianni Infantino announced that FIFA had created a new global honour—the “FIFA Peace Prize: Football Unites the World”—an award designed to recognise individuals whose actions, influence, or leadership have contributed to peace, unity, and global harmony. With the world watching, Infantino declared Donald Trump as the inaugural recipient.
Infantino described the award as a symbol of unity, explaining that FIFA’s mission extends beyond football matches and tournaments. He emphasised that the governing body sees football as a vehicle for diplomacy and global collaboration. Presenting Trump with a gold medal, a trophy featuring hands lifting the world, and an official certificate, he stated, “This is your prize. This is your peace prize. It is a recognition of your efforts to promote stability and cooperation across different parts of the world.”
Trump, visibly delighted, accepted the honour and called it “one of the greatest recognitions” of his life. He expressed gratitude to Infantino and FIFA, noting that football is “a strong force for unity.” He went on to say that his presidency had contributed to peace efforts in regions such as the Congo, the Middle East, and South Asia, claiming that millions of lives had been saved due to diplomatic interventions and negotiation efforts. He also praised the collaborative spirit behind the 2026 World Cup, jointly hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, describing the tournament as “a demonstration of how nations can work together.”
However, despite the glamour and applause present in the auditorium, the announcement has generated controversy worldwide. Critics argue that the award appears rushed, politically motivated, and lacking transparency. Questions have also been raised about the timing, coming shortly after Trump missed out on the Nobel Peace Prize—an honour he had publicly expressed interest in winning. The fact that FIFA introduced the Peace Prize only weeks before awarding it has also fueled speculation.
Some observers have suggested that the creation and immediate awarding of the prize indicate an unusual level of alignment between FIFA leadership and President Trump. Analysts and football governance experts note that FIFA has historically avoided direct political commendations to prevent perceptions of bias. The introduction of a peace-related honour — especially one aimed at political leadership — marks a significant shift in how FIFA positions itself on global issues.
Others have defended the move, stating that football’s impact extends far beyond stadiums and sport. Supporters argue that if football can foster unity in divided societies, it is appropriate for FIFA to recognise individuals who champion peace-building efforts. They believe the award could strengthen football’s role as a soft-power tool for collaboration, especially with the massive global attention that accompanies major tournaments like the 2026 World Cup.
Still, concerns remain about the selection committee and the criteria used for choosing the winner. FIFA has not released details about how the decision was made, who was considered, or what metrics were used to determine influence on global peace. The absence of transparency has deepened the debate, with some critics warning that this could damage FIFA’s credibility at a time when the organisation continues to rebuild trust following past corruption scandals.
The award also places pressure on FIFA moving forward. As a newly introduced annual prize, the world will watch to see whether future recipients are chosen with clearer guidelines and whether the prize maintains legitimacy beyond its inaugural edition. If FIFA positions the Peace Prize as a serious, globally respected honour, the organisation will need to outline a defined selection process and involve diverse, independent voices. If handled poorly, the prize risks becoming a symbolic gesture that fuels divisions rather than promoting unity.
For now, the spotlight remains on the historic decision and its implications. With the 2026 World Cup drawing nearer—and excitement building across the United States, Mexico, and Canada—FIFA’s decision to honour a sitting political leader will undoubtedly continue to dominate discussion in the global football space. Whether seen as visionary or polarizing, the inaugural FIFA Peace Prize has ensured that the build-up to the tournament begins with more political attention than ever.
FIFA maintains that its aim is to celebrate peace through the universal language of football. Time will tell how this new award evolves, how it shapes FIFA’s global influence, and how football fans respond as the conversation continues.
Follow AfricaLiveNews on all platforms:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfricaLiveNews2
Facebook: https://facebook.com/AfricaLiveNews
Instagram: https://instagram.com/AfricaLiveNews
