A major diplomatic storm has erupted between Elon Musk and the European Union following the bloc’s decision to fine X (formerly Twitter) €120 million ($140 million) for what regulators described as “deceptive” design practices and a lack of transparency around advertising and public data. The clash has escalated dramatically, with Musk openly calling for the abolition of the EU and prompting strong reactions from top U.S. government officials, signaling growing geopolitical tensions around digital regulation.
The dispute began on Friday after the European Commission announced the fine, following a two-year investigation into X’s compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA)—a landmark legislative framework adopted in 2022 to regulate large online platforms and increase accountability. The Commission said X’s paid blue checkmark system misled users by implying verification without conducting meaningful identity checks. Officials also criticized X for failing to provide a transparent advertising repository and for restricting researchers’ access to public data—both mandatory requirements under the DSA.
Shortly after the ruling was posted online, Musk reacted in typical blunt fashion. Responding directly to an EU Commission update on X, he wrote a one-word reply: “Bulls—.” His frustration did not stop there. By Saturday morning, the billionaire had escalated his rhetoric, declaring that the European Union should no longer exist.
“The EU should be abolished, and sovereignty returned to individual countries, so that governments can better represent their people,” Musk wrote. His comments immediately triggered widespread debate, with supporters praising him for challenging what they see as excessive regulation, while critics accused him of undermining democratic institutions and ignoring the responsibilities that come with running a global communication platform.
Musk’s statement comes at a moment when senior U.S. officials have intensified their attacks on the EU’s decision, framing it as an attack on American innovation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded on X, calling the fine “an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments.” Rubio’s remarks marked an unusually direct intervention from a high-ranking U.S. official into a European regulatory matter.
Andrew Puzder, the U.S. Ambassador to the EU, echoed similar sentiments a day later. Describing the €120 million fine as “excessive,” Puzder argued that it represented a clear case of regulatory overreach aimed specifically at American companies. “The Trump Administration has been clear: we oppose censorship and will challenge burdensome regulations that target US companies abroad,” he said. He added that the United States expects “fair, open, and reciprocal trade — and nothing less.”
The Public backlash from top U.S. officials demonstrates how digital policy has increasingly become a battleground for global political and economic competition. Washington and Brussels have long disagreed on how to regulate online platforms, with the EU favoring strict oversight and transparency requirements, while many U.S. leaders view heavy regulation as a threat to innovation and free enterprise.
Meanwhile, European regulators insist that the DSA is not anti-American but is instead designed to protect users across the 27-member bloc. In its ruling, the European Commission laid out several areas where X was found to be non-compliant. These included:
– The “deceptive design” of the blue checkmark, which it said misled users about verification.
– A lack of transparency in X’s advertising repository, which must clearly disclose political, commercial, and sponsored content.
– Failure to provide researchers with access to public data, hindering independent analysis of misinformation, digital manipulation, and security risks.
Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s executive vice president overseeing tech sovereignty and security, issued a strong statement following the ruling. “With the DSA’s first non-compliance decision, we are holding X responsible for undermining users’ rights and evading accountability,” she said. “Platforms must be held to the same standards as consumers expect from the digital ecosystem.”
The Commission has now given X a strict timeline to take corrective action. The company has 60 days to outline how it will fix issues linked to “deceptive” blue checkmarks and 90 days to present a detailed plan addressing problems with its advertising repository and researcher access tools. According to the Commission, “Failure to comply with the non-compliance decision may lead to periodic penalty payments,” a warning that indicates even larger fines could follow.
Although Musk has remained defiant, the long-term implications for X are significant. Under the DSA, the European Union can impose financial penalties amounting to as much as 6% of a company’s global annual revenue for repeated non-compliance. For X, such fines would translate into hundreds of millions of euros or more, depending on company performance.
The clash has also revived global debate about Musk’s leadership and the direction of X since his acquisition. While some praise his push for free speech and reduced moderation, critics argue that the platform has become increasingly chaotic, less transparent, and more vulnerable to misinformation. The Commission’s findings on deceptive design and lack of transparency further fuel these concerns.
Diplomatic analysts warn that this dispute could escalate into a deeper standoff between the EU and the United States, especially if Washington continues framing EU digital regulations as an attack on American businesses. Already, Musk’s call for the dissolution of the EU is being interpreted by many European leaders as an extreme and provocative statement.
For now, the European Commission appears committed to enforcing the DSA without exception. X, on the other hand, appears equally committed to resisting what Musk views as unnecessary interference in platform governance. As the 60- and 90-day deadlines approach, both sides are preparing for what could be one of the most significant regulatory battles in the history of modern digital platforms.
The outcome will have major implications—not just for X, but for the future of global tech regulation, transatlantic relations, and the balance of power between governments and online platforms shaping public discourse.
Follow Africalivenews:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/africalivenews
X (Twitter): https://x.com/africalivenews2
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/africalivenews
