The flagbearer of the People’s National Convention (PNC), Bernard Mornah, has announced his intention to petition the Supreme Court following the High Court’s dismissal of his suit aimed at overturning the Electoral Commission’s (EC) decision to disqualify him from contesting in the 2024 presidential election.
Mornah’s disqualification was part of a broader decision that affected ten other candidates, igniting significant political discourse around the electoral process and the EC’s authority.
Speaking to the media on Monday, October 21, shortly after the ruling, Mornah asserted that the EC erred in its decision to disqualify him and the other candidates, claiming that their actions were not justified. He expressed confidence in the validity of his claims and emphasized the necessity for a higher court to review the case to ensure that justice is served.
Mornah pointed out that the EC’s disqualification stemmed from mistakes made on their own forms, indicating that such errors should not be held against candidates. He articulated his belief that the ruling did not adequately consider the nature of the alleged errors, arguing that the High Court’s judgment failed to engage with critical aspects of the case. “The EC made mistakes on their own forms, and we are not allowed to make mistakes,” he stated. “The judge did not look at that, and that defies ordinary thinking. What is the error that they are talking about? Is it a data entry error that they are talking about, or is it an error of composition? How come those errors were not brought to court?”
Mornah expressed frustration with the judicial process, suggesting that the High Court’s ruling overlooked essential issues that he and his legal team raised. He maintained that the EC’s mistakes should have been grounds for reconsideration of the disqualification. “The judge did not look at the issues that were brought before it, and I have already instructed my lawyers that this case is not ending here,” Mornah said.
In preparation for his appeal, Mornah has instructed his legal team to expedite their study of the case, indicating that he is eager to present his arguments before the Supreme Court. He believes that a higher court will better understand the complexities of the matter and rectify what he perceives as the High Court’s shortcomings.
Mornah’s announcement to petition the Supreme Court comes amidst a politically charged atmosphere as candidates prepare for the upcoming elections. His determination to fight the EC’s decision reflects his commitment to securing his place on the ballot and advocating for a transparent electoral process. The disqualification of candidates, particularly those from smaller parties like the PNC, raises concerns about the inclusivity and fairness of the electoral system.
The EC’s role in the electoral process is critical, and its decisions can significantly impact the political landscape. Mornah’s case highlights the ongoing tensions between candidates and the EC, especially regarding the criteria used for disqualification and the accountability of the Commission in handling candidate nominations. Mornah’s assertion that the EC’s errors should not penalize candidates underscores the need for an equitable electoral process that allows all qualified individuals the opportunity to contest for office.
As Mornah prepares for his legal battle, the political implications of his case could reverberate throughout the upcoming elections. A ruling from the Supreme Court in favor of Mornah may not only reinstate his candidacy but could also set a precedent for how the EC manages candidate nominations in the future. Conversely, if the Supreme Court upholds the High Court’s ruling, it may embolden the EC to continue with its current practices regarding candidate qualifications and disqualifications.
The PNC has historically faced challenges in gaining traction within Ghana’s political landscape, and Mornah’s candidacy represents an effort to amplify the voices of smaller parties amid a system dominated by larger political entities. His commitment to pursuing legal recourse reflects a broader struggle for representation and fairness in Ghana’s electoral politics.
Mornah’s confidence in his legal strategy and the belief that the Supreme Court will recognize the validity of his claims could galvanize support among his constituents and party members. By appealing to the highest court, he is not only seeking personal vindication but is also positioning himself as a defender of democratic principles and the rule of law.
As the political climate intensifies in the lead-up to the 2024 elections, Mornah’s case will be closely watched by political analysts, party supporters, and the general public. The outcome of his appeal may influence the electoral strategies of other candidates and parties, particularly those navigating the complexities of candidacy within Ghana’s electoral framework.
In conclusion, Bernard Mornah’s decision to petition the Supreme Court represents a significant development in the ongoing discourse surrounding the Electoral Commission’s role and the integrity of the electoral process in Ghana. His legal battle highlights the importance of accountability and transparency in elections, ensuring that all candidates, regardless of their political affiliation, have the opportunity to contest fairly. As the PNC flagbearer prepares for this next phase of his campaign, the implications of his case will undoubtedly resonate throughout the political landscape as Ghana approaches the 2024 presidential elections.
