The National Peace Council has called for an immediate cessation of hate speech in Ghana’s political discourse, warning of its growing prevalence and the potential to incite violence ahead of the upcoming December 7 general elections. The council’s urgent appeal was made during a recent meeting with leaders of alternative political parties, emphasizing the need for a more civil and respectful political environment.
Maulvi Mohammed Bin Salih, Chairman of the Code of Conduct Implementation Committee of the Peace Council, highlighted the serious threat that inflammatory language poses to Ghana’s peace and security. Speaking at the meeting, he expressed grave concerns about the increasing use of provocative and hostile rhetoric by political figures and commentators, which he believes could undermine the stability of the nation.
“The use of hate speech is not just a threat to political dialogue but a direct threat to the peace and security we have worked so hard to maintain,” stated Maulvi Mohammed Bin Salih. “We are witnessing a dangerous trend where political discussions are dominated by insults and inflammatory language, creating an atmosphere of tension and hostility that can easily spill over into violence.”
He also warned that the spread of such divisive language in the public sphere encourages young people to adopt similar rhetoric, perpetuating a cycle of animosity and aggression that is difficult to break. “You listen to the radio in the morning in Ghana, and the only thing you hear is war drums being beaten left, right, centre, and back,” he noted. “On the television, there are two or three gentlemen and ladies at each other’s throats, shouting at each other, swearing at each other, as if we were in a war-torn country.”
The Peace Council’s appeal comes at a critical time, as Ghana prepares for one of its most competitive general elections in recent years. The political climate has become increasingly polarized, with sharp rhetoric and aggressive tactics becoming more commonplace in campaign messaging and media coverage. The council’s intervention seeks to de-escalate tensions and promote a more constructive dialogue among political actors and their supporters.
Maulvi Mohammed Bin Salih further emphasized the harmful effects of hate speech on public health and societal well-being. “Now, this is an unhealthy political atmosphere,” he continued. “Since we are the ones living in that atmosphere, let us not deceive ourselves into thinking that it will not affect our health. A toxic political environment contributes to stress, anxiety, and even physical ailments among the population.”
The Peace Council is urging political leaders, party representatives, and the media to exercise greater restraint and responsibility in their communication. It is calling for a renewed commitment to civility, respect, and constructive engagement, underscoring that the stakes are too high to allow hate speech to go unchecked.
Political analysts have echoed the Peace Council’s concerns, warning that the escalation of hostile language could fuel divisions and lead to violence during the election period. Recent studies have shown a correlation between inflammatory political rhetoric and incidents of electoral violence in various countries, raising fears that Ghana could be at risk if immediate action is not taken.
Civil society organizations and religious groups have also joined the call for peace, urging political actors to prioritize national unity over partisan interests. Several religious leaders have been vocal in condemning hate speech and advocating for a peaceful and fair electoral process. “Ghana is known for its democratic maturity and peaceful transitions,” remarked a leading clergy member. “We must not allow our reputation to be tarnished by the reckless behavior of a few individuals who seek to divide us.”
In response to the Peace Council’s appeal, some political parties have pledged to promote respectful discourse and to discourage their members from engaging in hate speech. However, others argue that the current atmosphere reflects genuine frustrations and that political speech should not be overly censored. This stance has led to debates on where to draw the line between free expression and responsible communication.
The National Peace Council, however, remains firm in its position, asserting that all political actors have a duty to protect Ghana’s peace and stability. The council is planning a series of follow-up meetings and workshops with political parties, media organizations, and community leaders to build consensus on the need for peaceful communication and to develop strategies for mitigating hate speech.
As the December 7 elections draw closer, the Peace Council’s message serves as a timely reminder of the importance of safeguarding the democratic values and social harmony that have long been the bedrock of Ghana’s national identity. The call to end hate speech is not just a plea for political civility but a necessary step to ensure a peaceful and successful election process.
Moving forward, it is hoped that all stakeholders will heed this call, working together to foster a political environment that is not only vibrant and competitive but also respectful and inclusive. As Maulvi Mohammed Bin Salih aptly put it, “The future of our democracy depends on the choices we make today – let us choose peace, unity, and progress for all.”
