South Africa’s long-standing confusion over the “Polo” fashion brand is finally nearing a decisive conclusion. For nearly five decades, two unrelated Polo labels—one American, one South African—have coexisted in the local market, creating one of the most unusual brand identity puzzles in global fashion. That chapter is now closing, as the Competition Commission has officially approved Ralph Lauren Corporation’s acquisition of the South African Polo trademarks previously owned by the LA Group.
The landmark approval, first reported by BusinessTech, represents a major breakthrough for a country where generations of consumers have grown up believing that the Polo apparel sold domestically was connected to the internationally acclaimed Ralph Lauren brand. In reality, the two had no ties whatsoever—a truth that even many retailers struggled to fully grasp.
For decades, South Africans have quietly lived with this ambiguity. A shirt bearing a mounted polo player was widely assumed to be a Ralph Lauren original, even though the American fashion house had been locked out of using its own Polo logo in the country. The misunderstanding was so deep-rooted that it became a norm. Shoppers bought the local Polo brand with confidence, unaware that it had no affiliation with the global luxury giant whose collections dominate runways and premium boutiques worldwide.
How Two Polo Brands Came to Exist Side-by-Side
The confusion traces back to 1967, when Ralph Lauren introduced its iconic Polo brand and horse-and-rider emblem to the world. The brand quickly became synonymous with American luxury, elegance, and lifestyle fashion. But in South Africa, a different story was unfolding.
In 1976—nearly ten years after Ralph Lauren’s debut—the LA Group, a South African company, successfully registered a similar horse-and-rider logo under the Polo name. Because South Africa’s trademark laws at the time prioritized local registrations over international brand presence, Ralph Lauren was effectively shut out of operating under the “Polo” label in the country. When the American company challenged the registration in 1977, the attempt failed, leaving the LA Group with undisputed rights to the Polo name in South Africa.
From that point onward, two distinct Polo brands existed:
— Ralph Lauren Polo, recognized globally but restricted locally
— South Africa’s Polo, owned and developed by the LA Group
The two operated independently, each cultivating separate markets and identities. But to the average South African consumer, the presence of a polo player on a shirt was enough to suggest international luxury. This misconception persisted for nearly 50 years.
Competition Commission Approval: A Turning Point
The recent decision by the Competition Commission marks the most significant shift in the brand’s South African history. With the green light to acquire the locally held trademarks, Ralph Lauren is poised to unify the fragmented identity under one brand vision for the first time.
The Commission found no substantial competition concerns arising from the acquisition, noting that the deal would mainly resolve long-standing overlaps rather than create new market dominance issues. However, the approval was not without conditions. To protect workers, a temporary moratorium was placed on retrenchments involving permanent employees responsible for manufacturing, distributing, and selling Polo-branded goods associated with the transferred assets. This safeguard ensures that the transition does not create immediate economic disruptions for those employed within the LA Group’s Polo business.
The Trademark Battles That Complicated the Story Further
While the relationship between Ralph Lauren and the LA Group was already complex, matters escalated dramatically between 2015 and 2022 after the LA Group became embroiled in a fierce legal battle with the United States Polo Association (USPA). The USPA—represented locally by Stable Brands—also used a polo-player emblem under the US POLO ASSN. label.
In 2015, the LA Group sued the USPA for infringement, arguing that its use of a polo player image infringed on its South African trademarks. The dispute took an unexpected turn when the High Court stripped the LA Group of more than 40 trademarks during the litigation process. Stable Brands argued that South African consumers were largely unaware that the Polo brands were separate, making it impossible for shoppers to distinguish between US PA-branded products, the local Polo brand, and the internationally known Ralph Lauren Polo.
Court documents from the period also revealed a long-speculated coexistence agreement between Ralph Lauren and the LA Group. According to these revelations, Ralph Lauren was permitted to use the Polo name for cosmetics in South Africa, while the LA Group retained exclusive rights for clothing and related fashion goods. This arrangement further contributed to public confusion.
However, in 2022, the Supreme Court of Appeal overturned the High Court ruling, restoring all stripped trademarks back to the LA Group. Though the decision reinstated the company’s intellectual property rights, the brand identity dilemma persisted—until the present acquisition introduced a path toward unification.
What the Acquisition Means for South Africa’s Fashion Landscape
With Ralph Lauren now positioned to take over the South African Polo trademarks, industry analysts expect significant changes in branding, marketing, and market positioning. A unified Polo identity under Ralph Lauren could potentially elevate South Africa’s fashion retail environment, aligning it more closely with global brand standards.
For consumers, the transition may finally bring clarity. Polo products sold in South Africa will no longer carry the ambiguity that has defined the brand for decades. Retailers may also experience a shift in supply dynamics and pricing structures as Ralph Lauren integrates its global distribution networks and quality standards into the local market.
What remains critical is how the trademarks will be incorporated and whether the LA Group will continue manufacturing or distributing products under licensing arrangements. The Competition Commission’s conditions ensure that workers are shielded during the transition, but longer-term operational changes may still unfold as Ralph Lauren reorganizes the brand’s presence.
A New Chapter After 50 Years of Confusion
For half a century, the Polo name has meant different things to different people in South Africa—luxury for some, affordability for others, and confusion for many. With this acquisition, Ralph Lauren appears ready to reshape that narrative and bring a long-awaited resolution to one of fashion’s most perplexing brand identity conflicts.
As the deal moves into its implementation phase, South Africans may soon witness a clearer, more unified Polo brand that finally aligns with the global legacy behind the iconic horse-and-rider.
Follow Africa Live News
📌 Facebook: https://facebook.com/africalivenews
📌 X (Twitter): https://x.com/africalivenews2
📌 Instagram: https://instagram.com/africalivenews
