The Awutu Bereku District Court has remanded Cassius Otoo Larbi, the Communications Officer for the National Democratic Congress (NDC) in the Awutu Senya West constituency, and two other individuals into police custody.
The ruling, delivered by Her Ladyship Naomi Konto, followed accusations that the three individuals threatened an eyewitness who caught them removing posters belonging to Eugene Kofi Bentum Arhin, the parliamentary candidate for the New Patriotic Party (NPP).
The incident reportedly took place at a location where a machine used for the District Road Improvement Project was stationed. The NPP posters were allegedly being taken down from the machine when the eyewitness intervened. The suspects were arrested and taken to court, where they were remanded for five days. They are scheduled to reappear in court on Monday, September 16, 2024, to answer the charges brought against them.
This legal development has sparked mixed reactions in the constituency, with various political figures weighing in on the situation. Gizella Tetteh Agbotui, the Member of Parliament (MP) for Awutu Senya West, expressed her displeasure, stating that her own posters had also been removed and described the legal proceedings as “petty.” According to the MP, the removal of political posters should not be a matter that leads to arrests and court cases, especially in the context of heightened political activity as elections approach. She argued that such issues could be resolved amicably between political parties rather than involving the law enforcement agencies.
However, the District Chief Executive (DCE) for Awutu Senya West, Moses Arhinful Acquah, countered this perspective, clarifying that the case is not just about the removal of posters but also concerns the threats made against an eyewitness. Acquah explained that the eyewitness had simply advised the group to stop removing the posters, which led to the threats that are now the subject of the court case. He insisted that this is a serious matter that cannot be dismissed as petty, especially given the potential for escalating tensions in the community.
Acquah also referred to a previous incident involving Cassius Otoo Larbi and others, where they allegedly caused a disturbance at the annual Awubia Festival. According to the DCE, during the event, which was being addressed by Vice President Mahamudu Bawumia, Larbi and his group reportedly played loud music to disrupt the Vice President’s speech. This act drew the attention of national security operatives, who viewed it as an attempt to undermine a high-profile government function. The DCE suggested that these actions show a pattern of behavior by Larbi that warrants scrutiny and, if necessary, legal action to maintain order in the constituency.
The case has ignited discussions on the broader issue of political tensions and the conduct of party members as the country gears up for upcoming elections. Observers note that the incident reflects a larger trend of heightened sensitivities surrounding political activities in the region. With elections on the horizon, political parties are increasingly vigilant about their public image, and any perceived provocations or disruptions are being met with swift responses.
Supporters of the NPP have applauded the decision to remand the suspects, arguing that it sends a clear message that intimidation and threats will not be tolerated. They believe that the legal action will serve as a deterrent to similar incidents in the future and help maintain peace in the constituency. Some NPP members have also suggested that the actions of Larbi and his group are indicative of a broader strategy by the NDC to create instability and discredit the government ahead of the elections.
On the other hand, NDC members and supporters have criticized the court’s decision, claiming it is an attempt to intimidate their members and stifle legitimate political expression. They argue that the removal of posters is a minor issue that does not warrant police intervention and a court case. Some NDC members have accused the DCE and local authorities of using state resources to target their political opponents, describing the legal action as politically motivated.
Civil society groups and political analysts have also weighed in on the matter, with some expressing concern that such incidents could escalate if not carefully managed. They have called for dialogue between the political parties to de-escalate tensions and ensure that the upcoming elections are conducted in a peaceful and fair manner. Some analysts believe that the case presents an opportunity for both parties to demonstrate a commitment to peaceful political engagement and to set an example for their supporters.
Meanwhile, local residents have expressed mixed feelings about the unfolding drama. Some residents see the court’s decision as a necessary step to maintain law and order, while others feel that the case could have been handled differently to avoid heightening tensions. There are concerns that the incident could lead to further divisions within the community, especially if it is perceived as being politically motivated.
As the court date approaches, all eyes will be on the Awutu Bereku District Court to see how the case unfolds. The outcome could have significant implications for the political landscape in the Awutu Senya West constituency and beyond. Both the NPP and NDC will be closely monitoring the proceedings, knowing that the verdict could either diffuse or inflame the already tense atmosphere in the area.
The case serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining decorum and respect in political discourse, particularly during an election period.
It also underscores the need for political leaders and their supporters to adhere to the rule of law and to engage in constructive dialogue rather than resorting to intimidation or threats. Whatever the outcome, the situation in Awutu Senya West is a clear indication of the challenges that lie ahead as the country prepares for its next round of elections.
